In today’s digital age, social media (SM) has become a ubiquitous presence in the lives of adolescents, leaving many parents questioning whether their children need these platforms to fit in. The pressure to conform can feel overwhelming, but is it truly necessary? Are there ways to navigate this modern dilemma? These questions lie at the heart of a study we conducted in collaboration with the University of Padova. In this first installment, we’ll explore the theoretical foundations driving our research. The second part will unveil our findings and their implications for parents, educators, and policy makers. Together, these posts aim to shed light on the complex relationship between social media use, peer norms, and adolescents’ social well-being.
Adolescence is a transformative period marked by a heightened focus on peer relationships.During this time, young people are not only shaping their identities but also seeking social recognition and acceptance [1]. Peer socialization plays a pivot al role in this process, offering adolescents a sense of belonging and reducing feelings of loneliness [2]. Research shows that when teens feel supported socially, they are happier, healthier, and even perform better in school. On the flip side, loneliness during this stage is linked to mental health struggles and risky behavior [3]
Enter social media, a digital extension of the peer landscape. Platforms likeInstagram and TikTok provide adolescents with unprecedented opportunities to connect, share, and interact. For many, these platforms are a developmentally appropriate tool for building relationships and exploring their identities.Yet, the impact of social media on well-being remains a topic of heated debate.While some studies suggest that social media use can enhance social support and connection, others point to its potential for fostering loneliness, anxiety, and addiction [4, 5].
Our study seeks to untangle these conflicting findings by examining how different dimensions of social media use—time spent on social media, problematic social media use (PSMU), and social media communication—interact with peer norms to shape adolescents’ social well-being.
Peer norms are the unwritten rules that govern behavior within social groups. They dictate what’s considered acceptable, desirable, or “cool” among adolescents. For young people, these norms manifest in peer groups, such as classrooms. Italian school classes, for instance, are highly stable cohorts that foster the development of friendships, cliques, and larger social networks. Within these groups, descriptive norms emerge, guiding behaviors and minimizing differences among peers [6]
But peer influence doesn’t stop at the classroom door. In the digital age, social media has become a parallel microsystem where adolescents interact and socialize.According to the transformation framework, social media platforms amplify traditional peer processes by increasing the frequency and immediacy of communication [7]. This means that the norms governing offline behavior often extend into the online world, shaping how adolescents use social media and the outcomes they experience.
The ubiquity of social media in adolescents’ lives is undeniable. Data from theHealth Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey reveals that over 80% of11-year-olds use social media daily, with usage rates climbing as they grow older [8]. This widespread adoption underscores the importance of understanding how social media use impacts adolescents’ social well-being.
Interestingly, the effects of social media use can vary depending on the context. For example, recent research found that intense social media use is associated with adverse mental health outcomes in countries where such behavior is uncommon [9]. In contrast, in countries where intense use is the norm, it’s linked to higher social well-being. This phenomenon aligns with the normalization theory, which suggests that wide spread adoption of a behavior can reduce its psychosocial risks.
To better understand the relationship between social media use and well-being, our study examines three key dimensions:
The displacement hypothesis posits that excessive time spent on social media can detract from activities known to enhance well-being, such as in-person socializing and physical exercise [10]. There’s some truth to this. One study found that as internet use rises across Europe, more teens report mental health struggles [11]. However, not all intense use is detrimental. In contexts where intense use is normalized, it can be associated with positive outcomes. In fact, some teens can spend hours online without negative effects. What really matters could be how that time is spent.
PSMU refers to an addiction-like pattern of social media use, characterized by symptoms such as salience, mood modification, and withdrawal [12]. Research links PSMU to psychological distress, body dissatisfaction, and social anxiety. Adolescents experiencing PSMU often prioritize their devices over real-world interactions, leading to lower social support [13, 14].
According to the interpersonal-connection-behaviors framework [15], social media can enhance well-being when it fosters genuine connections. In fact, adolescents who engage in targeted, active communication—such as interacting with friends’ posts—report higher levels of friendship quality and social support [16]
The digital age presents both challenges and opportunities for adolescents. On the one hand, social media offers a powerful tool for connection and self-expression. On the other, it can exacerbate feelings of loneliness, anxiety, and inadequacy. By understanding how peer norms shape social media use and its outcomes, we can help adolescents navigate this complex landscape in a way that promotes their well-being.
In the next post, we’ll share what we discovered and what it means for parents, educators, and teens themselves. Whether you’re navigating the digital world as a parent or simply curious about the latest research, stay tuned for insights that could change how we think about social media and its role in modern adolescence.
1. Laursen B, Veenstra R (2021) Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence 31:889–907.
2. Veenstra R, Laninga-Wijnen L (2023) The prominence of peer interactions, relationships, and networks in adolescence and early adulthood. In: APA handbook of adolescent and young adult development. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, pp 225–241
3. Montgomery SC, Donnelly M, Bhatnagar P, et al (2020) Peer social network processes and adolescent health behaviors: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine 130:105900.
4. Valkenburg PM (2022) Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. Current Opinion in Psychology 45:101294.
5. Beyens I, Pouwels JL, van Driel II, et al (2020) The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent. SciRep 10:10763.
6. Veenstra R, Lodder GMA (2022) On the microfoundations oft he link between classroom social norms and behavioral development. International Journal of Behavioral Development 46:453–460.
7. Nesi J, Choukas-Bradley S, Prinstein MJ (2018) Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 1—A Theoretical Framework and Application to Dyadic Peer Relationships. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 21:267–294.
8. Boniel-Nissim M, Marino C, Galeotti T, et al (2024) A focus on adolescent social media use and gaming in Europe, central Asia andCanada. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children international report from the 2021/2022 survey. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen
9. Boer M, van den Eijnden RJJM, Boniel-Nissim M, et al (2020) Adolescents’ Intense and Problematic Social Media Use and TheirWell-Being in 29 Countries. Journal of Adolescent Health 66:S89–S99.
10. Hall JA, Liu D (2022) Social media use, social displacement, and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology 46:101339.
11. Boer M, Cosma A, Twenge JM, et al (2023) National-Level Schoolwork Pressure, Family Structure, Internet Use, and Obesity as Drivers of Time Trends in Adolescent Psychological Complaints Between 2002 and 2018. J Youth Adolescence 52:2061–2077.
12. Montag C, Demetrovics Z, Elhai JD, etal (2024) Problematic social media use in childhood and adolescence. Addictive Behaviors 107980.
13. Marino C, Gini G, Vieno A, Spada MM(2018) The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 226:274–281.
14. Varona MN, Muela A, Machimbarrena JM (2022) Problematic use or addiction? A scoping review on conceptual and operational definitions of negative social networking sites use in adolescents. Addictive Behaviors 134:107400.
15. Clark JL, Algoe SB, Green MC (2018) Social Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 27:32–37.
16. Angelini F, Marino C, Gini G (2023) Friendship quality in adolescence: the role of social media features, online social support and e-motions. Curr Psychol 42:26016–26032.
